Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Question of the Day #357

Would you rather be rich or famous?

I'd rather be rich. Fame looks way too invasive to me.

xoxo,
Suzanne

10 comments:

  1. Rich, definitely! I can think quite a few people who are famous but poor.

    ReplyDelete
  2. RICH! I have no interest in fame...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't want to be "paparazzi" famous but I'd like to leave behind something of value. Famous and poor, I guess. Like an artist with work unknown until after his/her death. Don't get me wrong, it would be better to get credit while alive but I'd take it over being rich just for the sake of being rich. I just want to leave a positive, distinct footprint.
    Wait, did I go off question?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I want to be rich for the sake of being rich! (hee, hee - couldn't resist, LD) I don't have any desire to be famous but I do have a desire to live comfortably and to be able to make a difference in the lives of those less fortunate.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Easy - rich.

    I don't get the lure of fame. I like my boring little private life.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I will take the cash. Too many crazies around to be famous. I just want to be a little rich though.

    ReplyDelete

Don't be shy! Please join our game of Questions.